Bill C-25
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment
void
|
(13) For the purposes of this Part, if an
assessment of a penalty that is referred to in
subsection (2) or (4) is vacated, the assessment
is deemed to be void.
|
|
Maximum
penalty
|
(14) A person who is liable at any time to a
penalty under both subsections (2) and (4) in
respect of the same false statement is liable to
pay a penalty that is not more than the greater
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
(15) If an employee (other than a specified
employee, as defined in subsection 248(1) of
the Income Tax Act, or an employee engaged
in an excluded activity) is employed by the
other person referred to in subsections (2) and
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burden of
proof in
respect of
penalties
|
(16) If, in an appeal under this Part, a
penalty assessed by the Minister under this
section or section 285 is in issue, the burden of
establishing the facts justifying the
assessment of the penalty is on the Minister.
|
|
|
(2) Subsection (1) applies to statements
made after the day on which this Act is
assented to.
|
|
1990, c. 45,
s. 12(1)
|
71. Paragraph 298(1)(e) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
1990, c. 45,
s. 12(1)
|
72. Subsection 327(3) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Penalty on
conviction
|
(3) A person who is convicted of an offence
under this section is not liable to pay a penalty
imposed under any of sections 283 to 285.1 for
the same evasion or attempt unless a notice of
assessment for that penalty was issued before
the information or complaint giving rise to the
conviction was laid or made.
|
|
1999, c. 26
|
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION ACT, 1999 |
|
|
73. (1) Paragraph 36(7)(a) of the Budget
Implementation Act, 1999, chapter 26 of the
Statutes of Canada, 1999, is replaced by the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Subsection (1) is deemed to have come
into force on June 17, 1999.
|
|