C-27 , 39th Parliament, 1st session Monday, April 3, 2006, to Friday, September 14, 2007
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (dangerous offenders and recognizance to keep the peace)
Summary
Current status
At consideration in committee in the House of Commons
Latest activity
Second reading and referral to committee on Friday, May 4, 2007 (House of Commons)
Progress
House of Commons
End of stage activity
Introduction and first reading, Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Tuesday, October 17, 2006 |
End of stage activity
Second reading and referral to committee, Friday, May 4, 2007
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Monday, October 30, 2006 |
|
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 |
|
Thursday, November 9, 2006 |
|
Wednesday, February 14, 2007 |
|
Friday, May 4, 2007 |
Sitting 147
Agreed to
(Journals 147)
|
Report stage
Not reached
Third reading
Not reached
First reading
Not reached
Second reading
Not reached
Third reading
Not reached
Details
Recorded votes
House of Commons
There are currently no recorded votes for this bill.
Senate
To view the complete list of standing votes that have taken place in the Senate, please refer to the Votes page of the Senate of Canada website.Speaker's rulings and statements
There are currently no Speaker's rulings and statements.
Major speeches at second reading
House of Commons
Speech date | Speech | Member of Parliament |
---|---|---|
Monday, October 30, 2006 | Sponsor’s speech(Sitting 72) | Vic Toews (Conservative) |
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 | Response speech(Sitting 73) | Sue Barnes (Liberal) |
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 | Response speech(Sitting 73) | Réal Ménard (Bloc Québécois) |
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 | Response speech(Sitting 73) | Libby Davies (NDP) |
About
Legislative summary
A legislative summary of this bill is available from the Library of Parliament.
Similar bills
No similar bills were introduced during previous sessions or Parliaments
From the Library of Parliament
The Library of Parliament’s research publications provide non-partisan, reliable and timely information and analysis on current and emerging issues, legislation and major public policy topics.
Further reading
Are sex offenders dangerous?.
Sample, Lisa L.
Criminology and public policy, 3:59-82
Lifetime sex offender recidivism: a 25-year follow-up study.
Langevin, Ron et al.
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice, 46:531-52
Never going home: does it make us safer? Does it make sense?.
Durling, Caleb.
Journal of criminal law & criminology, 97:317-63
Public attitudes to sentencing in Canada: exploring recent findings.
Roberts, Julian V., Nicole Crutcher and Paul Verbrugge.
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice, 49:75-107
Reply to Webster, Gartner, and Doob.
Langevin, Ron, Suzanne Curnoe and Paul Fedoroff.
Canadian journal of criminology & criminal justice, 48:107-17
Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
Webster, Cheryl Marie, Rosemary Gartner and Anthony N. Doob.
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice, 48:79-93
The dangerous offender provisions: are they targeting the right offenders?.
Bonta, James L. et al.
Canadian journal of criminology, 40:377-400
The interplay between Christopher's Law and the Sex Offender Information Registration Act.
Laine, Yeshe.
Criminal law quarterly, 52:470-97
Tracking high-risk, violent offenders: an examination of the National Flagging System.
Yessine, Annie K.
Canadian journal of criminology & criminal justice, 48:573-607
What population and what question?.
Rice, Marnie E. and Grant T. Harris.
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice, 48:95-101