C-38 , 38th Parliament, 1st session Monday, October 4, 2004, to Tuesday, November 29, 2005
An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
Short title:
Civil Marriage Act
This bill received royal assent on Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Statutes of Canada 2005, c. 33
Progress
House of Commons
End of stage activity
Introduction and first reading, Tuesday, February 1, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Tuesday, February 1, 2005 |
End of stage activity
Second reading and referral to committee, Wednesday, May 4, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 |
|
Friday, February 18, 2005 |
|
Monday, February 21, 2005 |
|
Monday, March 21, 2005 |
|
Thursday, March 24, 2005 |
|
Monday, April 4, 2005 |
|
Tuesday, April 5, 2005 |
|
Wednesday, April 6, 2005 |
|
Tuesday, April 12, 2005 |
|
Tuesday, April 19, 2005 |
|
Thursday, April 21, 2005 |
|
Monday, May 2, 2005 |
|
Tuesday, May 3, 2005 |
|
Wednesday, May 4, 2005 |
Sitting 91
Agreed to
(Vote 76)
|
End of stage activity
Committee report presented, Thursday, June 16, 2005
Committee meetings
Meeting date | Minutes |
---|---|
Thursday, May 5, 2005 |
Meeting 1 |
Wednesday, May 11, 2005 |
Meeting 2 |
Thursday, May 12, 2005 |
Meeting 3 |
Monday, May 16, 2005 |
Meeting 4 |
Wednesday, May 18, 2005 |
Meeting 6 |
Tuesday, May 31, 2005 |
Meeting 8 |
Wednesday, June 1, 2005 |
Meeting 9 |
Thursday, June 2, 2005 |
Meeting 10 |
Thursday, June 2, 2005 |
Meeting 11 |
Monday, June 6, 2005 |
Meeting 12 |
Monday, June 6, 2005 |
Meeting 13 |
Tuesday, June 7, 2005 |
Meeting 14 |
Wednesday, June 8, 2005 |
Meeting 15 |
Wednesday, June 8, 2005 |
Meeting 16 |
Thursday, June 9, 2005 |
Meeting 17 |
Thursday, June 9, 2005 |
Meeting 18 |
Monday, June 13, 2005 |
Meeting 19 |
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 |
Meeting 20 |
Wednesday, June 15, 2005 |
Meeting 21 |
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Thursday, June 16, 2005 |
End of stage activity
Concurrence at report stage with a further amendment, Monday, June 27, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Monday, June 27, 2005 |
End of stage activity
Third reading, Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Tuesday, June 28, 2005 |
Sitting 124
Agreed to
(Vote 156)
|
Senate
End of stage activity
First reading, Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Wednesday, June 29, 2005 |
End of stage activities
Second reading, Wednesday, July 6, 2005
Referral to committee, Wednesday, July 6, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Monday, July 4, 2005 |
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2005 |
|
Wednesday, July 6, 2005 |
End of stage activity
Committee report presented, Monday, July 18, 2005
Committee meetings
Meeting date | Details |
---|---|
Monday, July 11, 2005 |
Meeting 42 |
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 |
Meeting 43 |
Tuesday, July 12, 2005 |
Meeting 44 |
Wednesday, July 13, 2005 |
Meeting 45 |
Wednesday, July 13, 2005 |
Meeting 46 |
Thursday, July 14, 2005 |
Meeting 47 |
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Monday, July 18, 2005 |
End of stage activity
Third reading, Tuesday, July 19, 2005
Chamber sittings
Sitting date | Debates (Hansard) |
---|---|
Tuesday, July 19, 2005 |
Details
Recorded votes
House of Commons
Vote 56 — Tuesday, April 12, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
2nd reading of Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (reasoned amendment)
- Yeas:
- 132
- Nays:
- 164
- Paired:
- 2
- Total:
- 298
Vote 75 — Wednesday, May 4, 2005
- Result:
- Agreed To
2nd reading of Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (previous question)
- Yeas:
- 163
- Nays:
- 138
- Paired:
- 0
- Total:
- 301
Vote 76 — Wednesday, May 4, 2005
- Result:
- Agreed To
2nd reading of Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
- Yeas:
- 164
- Nays:
- 137
- Paired:
- 0
- Total:
- 301
Vote 147 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Agreed To
Time allocation for Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
- Yeas:
- 163
- Nays:
- 106
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 273
Vote 148 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 109
- Nays:
- 163
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 276
Vote 149 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 122
- Nays:
- 157
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 283
Vote 150 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 103
- Nays:
- 175
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 282
Vote 151 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 103
- Nays:
- 174
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 281
Vote 152 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 103
- Nays:
- 174
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 281
Vote 153 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (report stage amendment)
- Yeas:
- 103
- Nays:
- 174
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 281
Vote 154 — Monday, June 27, 2005
- Result:
- Agreed To
Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
- Yeas:
- 154
- Nays:
- 124
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 282
Vote 155 — Tuesday, June 28, 2005
- Result:
- Negatived
Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes (recommittal to a committee)
- Yeas:
- 127
- Nays:
- 158
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 289
Vote 156 — Tuesday, June 28, 2005
- Result:
- Agreed To
3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-38, An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
- Yeas:
- 158
- Nays:
- 133
- Paired:
- 4
- Total:
- 295
Senate
To view the complete list of standing votes that have taken place in the Senate, please refer to the Votes page of the Senate of Canada website.Speaker's rulings and statements
There are currently no Speaker's rulings and statements.
Major speeches at second reading
House of Commons
Speech date | Speech | Member of Parliament |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 | Sponsor’s speech(Sitting 58) | Paul Martin (Liberal) |
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 | Response speech(Sitting 58) | Stephen Harper (Conservative) |
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 | Response speech(Sitting 58) | Gilles Duceppe (Bloc Québécois) |
Wednesday, February 16, 2005 | Response speech(Sitting 58) | Bill Siksay (NDP) |
Senate
Speech date | Speech | |
---|---|---|
Monday, July 4, 2005 | Sponsor’s speech(Sitting 80) | |
Monday, July 4, 2005 | Response speech(Sitting 80) |
About
Legislative summary
A legislative summary of this bill is available from the Library of Parliament.
Similar bills
No similar bills were introduced during previous sessions or Parliaments
From the Library of Parliament
The Library of Parliament’s research publications provide non-partisan, reliable and timely information and analysis on current and emerging issues, legislation and major public policy topics.
Further reading
A country evenly divided on gay marriage.
Parkin, Andrew.
Policy options, 24:39-41
Bringing international human rights law home: an evaluation of Canada's family law treatment of polygamy.
Kelly, Lisa M.
University of Toronto Faculty of Law review, 65:1-38
Coming out to Canada: the immigration of same-sex couples under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
LaViolette, Nicole.
McGill law journal, 49:969-1003
Defining marriage, step one: EGALE v. Canada.
Lloyd, Julie C..
Alberta law review, 39:963-76
Equality rights versus the right to marriage - toward the path of canadian compromise.
Julius Grey.
Policy options, 24:30-3
Five years after same-sex marriage bill, political effects still rippling.
Korski, Tom.
Hill Times, no. 1050:11
From equality rights to same-sex marriage - Parliament and the courts in the age of the Charter.
Hiebert, Janet L..
Policy options, 24:10-16
In search of more perfect heteroarchy: Vermont, civil unions and the harm of 'Separate-but-Equal'.
Thomas, Susan L.
Journal of homosexuality, 50:27-51
Incorporating common law into the Constitution of Canada: EGALE v. Canada and the status of marriage.
Walters, Mark D.
Osgoode Hall law journal, 41-75-113
Judicial analysis frozen in time: EGALE Canada Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General).
Pickel, Jo-Anne.
Saskatchewan law review, 65:243-68
La nature des fictions juridiques au sein du nouveau mode de filiation unisexuée au Québec; un retour aux sources?.
Savard, Anne-Marie.
Les cahiers de droit, 47:377-405
Le conflit des modèles sexuels contemporains.
Anatrella, Tony.
Revue d'éthique et de théologie morale, no 215:29-74
Le mariage homosexuel à la lumière des dispositifs d'alliance et de sexualité.
Charton, Laurence.
Bulletin d'histoire politique, 115:55-62
Marrying citizens! Raced subjects? Re-thinking the terrain of equal marriage discourse.
Lenon, Suzanne J.
Canadian journal of women and the law, 17:405-21
Moving toward same-sex marriage.
Casswell, Donald G.
Canadian bar review, 80:810-56
Partenariat civil et couples de même sexe : la réponse du Québec.
Roy, Alain.
Revue juridique Thémis, 35:663-96
Personal ideologies undermine the Charter.
Leishman, Rory.
Catholic insight, 12:10
Pluralisme conjugal ou hiérarchie des sexualités : la reconnaissance juridique des couples homosexuels dans L'Union européenne.
Borrillo, Daniel.
Revue de droit de McGill, 46:875-922
Polyamory, social conservatism and the same-sex marriage debate in the US.
Ashbee, Edward.
Politics, 27:101-7
Recognizing same-sex relationships: the evolution of recent federal and provincial policies.
Smith, Miriam.
Canadian public administration, 45:1-23
Refusing to officiate at same-sex civil marriages.
MacDougall, Bruce.
Saskatchewan law review, 69:351-73
Same-sex marriage and the notwithstanding clause.
Manfredi, Christopher P..
Policy options, 24:21-4
Same-sex relationships across borders.
Bailey, Martha.
McGill law journal, 49:1005-1033
Same-sex sexualities and the globalization of human rights discourse.
Stychin, Carl F.
McGill law journal, 49:951-68
Same-sex unions: the globalization of an idea.
Kollman, Kelly.
International studies quarterly, 51:329-57
Sexe, mariage et indifférence : le coup de grâce à la paternité.
Tahon, Maric-Blanche.
Argument : politique, société et histoire, 6:3-9
Sexual orientation and gender identity in North America: legal trends, legal contrasts.
Elliott, R. Douglas and Mary Bonauto.
Journal of homosexuality, 48:91-106
Sexual orientation and the Charter: the achievement of formal legal equality (1985-2005) and its limits.
Wintemute, Robert.
McGill law journal, 49:1143-1180
Speak now or forever hold your peace? Why we need queer critiques of gay marriage..
Thompson, Susan.
Canadian dimension, 38:17-18, 46
The essence of marriage : the very idea; reflection on H. Cyr.
Gray, Christopher B.
Revue générale de droit, 34:493-510
The German Federal Constitutional Court on same-sex life partnerships and same-sex marriage: comparing apples with oranges.
Ullrich, Dierk.
Canadian journal of family law, 20:179-96
The political foundation of support for same-sex marriage in Canada.
Matthews, J. Scott.
Canadian journal of political science, 38:841-66
The politics of same-sex marriage in Canada and the United States.
Smith, Miriam.
PS, 38:225-8
Vers une redéfinition du mariage?.
Laurin, Nicole.
Relations, no 688:5-7
Waiting in a new line at city hall: registered partnerships as an option for relationship recognition reform in Canada.
LaViolette, Nicole.
Canadian journal of family law, 19:115-72
What the framers of the Charter intended.
Fraser, Graham.
Policy options, 24:17-20