|
SCHEDULE 8
|
|
|
SCHEDULE IV.1
|
|
|
PROTOCOL AMENDING THE CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION AND THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME |
|
|
The Government of Canada and the Government of Japan,
desiring to amend the Convention between the
Government of Canada and the Government of Japan for
the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of
Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income signed at
Tokyo on May 7, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ``the
Convention''), have agreed as follows:
|
|
|
ARTICLE I |
|
|
Article 8 of the Convention shall be deleted and replaced by
the following:
|
|
|
``Article 8 |
|
|
1. Profits from the operation of ships or aircraft in international
traffic carried on by an enterprise of a Contracting State shall be
taxable only in that Contracting State.
|
|
|
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2, provided that
no political subdivision or local authority in Canada levies an
income tax or a tax similar to the enterprise tax in Japan in respect
of the operation of ships or aircraft in international traffic carried
on by an enterprise of Japan, an enterprise of Canada shall be
exempt from the local inhabitant taxes and the enterprise tax in
Japan in respect of the operation of ships or aircraft in
international traffic.
|
|
|
3. The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall also apply
to profits from the participation in a pool, a joint business or an
international operating agency.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE II |
|
|
Article 9 of the Convention shall be deleted and replaced by
the following:
|
|
|
``Article 9 |
|
|
1. Where
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and in either case conditions are made or imposed between the
two enterprises in their commercial or financial relations which
differ from those which would be made between independent
enterprises, then any profits which would, but for those
conditions, have accrued to one of the enterprises, but, by reason
of those conditions, have not so accrued, may be included in the
profits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly.
|
|
|
2. Where a Contracting State includes, in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 1, in the profits of an enterprise of that
Contracting State - and taxes accordingly - profits on which an
enterprise of the other Contracting State has been charged to tax
in that other Contracting State and where the competent
authorities of the Contracting States agree, upon consultation,
that all or part of the profits so included are profits which would
have accrued to the enterprise of the first-mentioned Contracting
State if the conditions made between the two enterprises had been
those which would have been made between independent
enterprises, then that other Contracting State shall make an
appropriate adjustment to the amount of tax charged therein on
those agreed profits. In determining such adjustment, due regard
shall be had to the other provisions of this Convention.
|
|
|
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, a
Contracting State shall not change the profits of an enterprise of
that Contracting State in the circumstances referred to in
paragraph 1 after seven years from the end of the taxable or
taxation year in which the profits that would be subject to such
change would, but for the conditions referred to in paragraph 1,
have accrued to that enterprise.
|
|
|
4. The provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3 shall not apply in the
case of fraud or wilful default.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE III |
|
|
Paragraph 2 of Article 10 of the Convention shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:
|
|
|
``2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the
Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is
a resident and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but
if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other
Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions of this paragraph shall not affect the taxation of
the company in respect of the profits out of which the dividends
are paid.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV |
|
|
Paragraph 2 of Article 11 of the Convention shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:
|
|
|
``2. However, such interest may also be taxed in the
Contracting State in which it arises and according to the laws of
that Contracting State, but if the beneficial owner of the interest
is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged
shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the interest.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE V |
|
|
Paragraph 2 of Article 12 of the Convention shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:
|
|
|
``2. However, such royalties may also be taxed in the
Contracting State in which they arise and according to the laws
of that Contracting State, but if the beneficial owner of the
royalties is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so
charged shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the
royalties.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI |
|
|
The following new Article shall be inserted immediately after
Article 24 of the Convention:
|
|
|
``Article 24A |
|
|
1. Each of the Contracting States shall endeavour to collect
such taxes imposed by the other Contracting State as will ensure
that any exemption or reduced rate of tax granted under this
Convention by that other Contracting State shall not be enjoyed
by persons not entitled to such benefits. The Contracting State
making such collections shall be responsible to the other
Contracting State for the sums thus collected.
|
|
|
2. In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 1 be construed
so as to impose upon either of the Contracting States
endeavouring to collect the taxes the obligation to carry out
administrative measures at variance with the laws and
administrative practice of that Contracting State or which would
be contrary to the public policy (ordre public) of that Contracting
State.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII |
|
|
Sub-paragraph (b) of Article 28 of the Convention shall be
deleted and replaced by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII |
|
|
1. The reference in sub-paragraph (c) of paragraph 7 of the
Protocol signed at Tokyo on May 7, 1986 (hereinafter referred to
as ``the Protocol of 1986'') to ``10 per cent'' shall be deleted and
replaced by a reference to ``5 per cent''.
|
|
|
2. The following new paragraphs shall be added immediately
after paragraph 7 of the Protocol of 1986:
|
|
|
``8. With reference to Article 8 of the Convention, it is
understood that profits from the operation of ships or aircraft in
international traffic shall also include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if such profits are incidental to profits to which the provisions of
paragraph 1 of that Article apply.
|
|
|
9. Notwithstanding the provisions of sub-paragraph (a) of
paragraph 2 of Article 10 of the Convention, dividends paid by
a company that is a resident of Canada and a non-resident-owned
investment corporation to a company that is a resident of Japan,
that owns at least 25 per cent of the voting shares of the company
paying the dividends throughout the period of six months
immediately before the end of the accounting period for which
the distribution of profits takes place and that is the beneficial
owner of such dividends, may be taxed in Canada at a rate not
exceeding 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends. For
the purposes of this paragraph, the term ``non-resident-owned
investment corporation'' has the meaning it has under the
provisions of subsection 8 of section 133 of the Income Tax Act
of Canada as they are in force on February 19, 1999, and any
subsequent modification of those provisions which shall not
affect the general principle hereof.''
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX |
|
|
1. This Protocol shall be ratified and the instruments of
ratification shall be exchanged at Tokyo as soon as possible.
|
|
|
2. This Protocol shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after
the date of the exchange of instruments of ratification and shall
have effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. This Protocol shall remain in effect as long as the
Convention remains in force.
|
|
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorized
thereto by their respective Governments, have signed this
Protocol.
|
|
|
DONE in duplicate at Ottawa on February 19, 1999, in the
English, French and Japanese languages, each text being equally
authentic.
|
|
|
FOR THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA: OF JAPAN: Lloyd
Axworthy Katsuhisa Uchida
|
|