|
(2) Subsection 95(3) of the Act is replaced
by the following:
|
|
Exception
|
(2.1) Subsection (2) does not apply in
respect of a margin deposit made by a clearing
member with a clearing house.
|
|
Definitions
|
(3) In this section,
|
|
``clearing
house'' « chambre de compensation »
|
``clearing house'' means a body that acts as an
intermediary for its clearing members in
effecting securities transactions;
|
|
``clearing
member'' « membre »
|
``clearing member'' means a person engaged
in the business of effecting securities
transactions who uses a clearing house as
intermediary;
|
|
``creditor'' « créancier »
|
``creditor'' includes a surety or guarantor for
the debt due to the creditor;
|
|
``margin
deposit
« dépôt de
couverture »
|
``margin deposit'' means a payment, deposit
or transfer to a clearing house under the
rules of the clearing house to assure the
performance of the obligations of a clearing
member in connection with security
transactions, including, without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, transactions
respecting futures, options or other
derivatives or to fulfil any of those
obligations.
|
|
Application
|
(3) Subsection (2) applies to bankruptcies
in respect of which proceedings are
commenced after that subsection comes
into force.
|
|
|
79. Section 96 of the Act is replaced by the
following:
|
|
Extended
period
|
96. Where the conveyance, transfer, charge,
payment, obligation or judicial proceeding
mentioned in section 95 is in favour of a
person related to the insolvent person, the
period referred to in subsection 95(1) shall be
one year instead of three months.
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
41
|
80. Subsection 97(1) of the Act is replaced
by the following:
|
|
Protected
transactions
|
97. (1) Subject to the foregoing provisions
of this Act with respect to the effect of
bankruptcy on an execution, attachment or
other process against property, and subject to
the provisions of this Act respecting
settlements, preferences and reviewable
transactions, nothing in this Act invalidates, in
the case of a bankruptcy,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the payment, delivery, conveyance, transfer,
contract, dealing or transaction, as the case
may be, was made in good faith and took place
between the date of the initial bankruptcy
event and the date of the bankruptcy.
|
|
|
81. Subsection 100(1) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Examination
of
consideration
in a
reviewable
transaction
|
100. (1) Where a bankrupt sold, purchased,
leased, hired, supplied or received property or
services in a reviewable transaction within the
period beginning on the day that is one year
before the date of the initial bankruptcy event
and ending on the date of the bankruptcy, both
dates included, the court may, on the
application of the trustee, inquire into whether
the bankrupt gave or received, as the case may
be, fair market value in consideration for the
property or services concerned in the
transaction.
|
|
|
82. (1) Subsections 101(1) to (3) of the Act
are replaced by the following:
|
|
Inquiry into
dividends and
redemptions
of shares
|
101. (1) Where a corporation that is
bankrupt has paid a dividend, other than a
stock dividend, or redeemed or purchased for
cancellation any of the shares of the capital
stock of the corporation within the period
beginning on the day that is one year before
the date of the initial bankruptcy event and
ending on the date of the bankruptcy, both
dates included, the court may, on the
application of the trustee, inquire into the
transaction to ascertain whether it occurred at
a time when the corporation was insolvent or
whether it rendered the corporation insolvent.
|
|
Judgment
against
directors
|
(2) The court may give judgment to the
trustee against the directors of the corporation,
jointly and severally, in the amount of the
dividend or redemption or purchase price,
with interest thereon, that has not been paid to
the corporation where the court finds that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
(2.1) In making a determination under
paragraph (2)(b), the court shall consider
whether the directors acted as prudent and
diligent persons would have acted in the same
circumstances and whether the directors in
good faith relied on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judgment
against
shareholders
|
(2.2) Where a transaction referred to in
subsection (1) has occurred and the court
makes a finding referred to in paragraph
(2)(a), the court may give judgment to the
trustee against a shareholder who is related to
one or more directors or to the corporation or
who is a director not liable by reason of
paragraph (2)(b) or subsection (3), in the
amount of the dividend or redemption or
purchase price referred to in subsection (1)
and the interest thereon, that was received by
the shareholder and not repaid to the
corporation.
|
|
Directors
exonerated by
law
|
(3) A judgment pursuant to subsection (2)
shall not be entered against or be binding on a
director who had, in accordance with any
applicable law governing the operation of the
corporation, protested against the payment of
the dividend or the redemption or purchase for
cancellation of the shares of the capital stock
of the corporation and had thereby exonerated
himself or herself under that law from any
liability therefor.
|
|
|
(2) Subsection 101(5) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Onus
|
(5) For the purposes of an inquiry under this
section, the onus of proving that the
corporation was not insolvent or, in the case of
the directors, that there were reasonable
grounds to believe that the corporation was
not insolvent, when a dividend was paid or
shares were redeemed or purchased for
cancellation or that the payment of a dividend
or a redemption of shares did not render the
corporation insolvent lies on the directors or
shareholders of the corporation.
|
|
Application
|
(3) Subsection (1) or (2) applies to
bankruptcies or proposals in respect of
which proceedings are commenced after
that subsection comes into force.
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
42(1)
|
83. Section 101.2 of the Act is replaced by
the following:
|
|
Provisions to
apply
|
101.2 Sections 91 to 101 apply as though
the debtor became bankrupt on the date of the
initial bankruptcy event where the proposal is
annulled either by the court pursuant to
subsection 63(1) or as a result of a receiving
order or assignment.
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
43(1)
|
84. (1) Subsection 102(1) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
First meeting
of creditors
|
102. (1) Subject to subsection (1.1), it is the
duty of the trustee to inquire as to the names
and addresses of the creditors of a bankrupt
and, within five days after the date of the
trustee's appointment, to send in the
prescribed manner to the bankrupt, to every
known creditor and to the Superintendent a
notice in the prescribed form of the
bankruptcy and of the first meeting of
creditors, to be held within the twenty-one day
period following the day of the trustee's
appointment, at the office of the official
receiver in the locality of the bankrupt, but the
official receiver may, when the official
receiver deems it expedient, authorize the
meeting to be held at the office of any other
official receiver or at such other place as the
official receiver may fix.
|
|
|
(2) Subsection 102(4) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Information
and notice
|
(3) In the case of the bankruptcy of an
individual, the trustee shall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publication in
local paper by
trustee
|
(4) A notice in the prescribed form shall, as
soon as possible after the bankruptcy and not
later than five days before the first meeting of
creditors, be published in a local newspaper by
the trustee.
|
|
Application
|
(3) Subsection (1) or (2) applies to
bankruptcies in respect of which
proceedings are commenced after that
subsection comes into force.
|
|
|
85. Subsection 104(1) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Notice of
subsequent
meetings
|
104. (1) Meetings of creditors other than the
first shall be called by sending a notice of the
time and place thereof not less than five days
before the time of each meeting to each
creditor at the address given in the creditor's
proof of claim.
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
46(2)
|
86. Subsection 109(6) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Creditor not
dealing at
arm's length
|
(6) Except as otherwise provided by this
Act, a creditor is not entitled to vote at any
meeting of creditors if the creditor did not, at
all times within the period beginning on the
day that is one year before the date of the
initial bankruptcy event in respect of the
debtor and ending on the date of the
bankruptcy, both dates included, deal with the
debtor at arm's length.
|
|
|
87. (1) Subsection 121(2) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Contingent
and
unliquidated
claims
|
(2) The determination whether a contingent
or unliquidated claim is a provable claim and
the valuation of such a claim shall be made in
accordance with section 135.
|
|
|
(2) Section 121 of the Act is amended by
adding the following after subsection (3):
|
|
Family
support claims
|
(4) A claim for spousal or child support
under any court order or agreement made
before the date of the bankruptcy of a debtor
for amounts accrued in the year before that
date, plus any lump sum amount payable
under the order or agreement before that date,
is a claim provable in proceedings under this
Act.
|
|
Application
|
(3) Subsection (1) or (2) applies to
bankruptcies or proposals in respect of
which proceedings are commenced after
that subsection comes into force.
|
|
|
88. Subsection 126(2) of the Act is
replaced by the following:
|
|
Worker's
wage claims
|
(2) Proofs of claims for wages of workers
and others employed by the bankrupt may be
made in one proof by the bankrupt or someone
on behalf of the bankrupt or by a
representative of a federal or provincial
ministry responsible for labour matters or a
representative of a union representing workers
and others employed by the bankrupt, by
attaching thereto a schedule setting out the
names and addresses of the workers and others
and the amounts severally due to them, but
that proof does not disentitle any worker or
other wage-earner to file a separate proof on
their own behalf.
|
|
|
89. (1) Section 135 of the Act is amended
by adding the following after subsection (1):
|
|
Determination
of provable
claims
|
(1.1) The trustee shall determine whether
any contingent claim or unliquidated claim is
a provable claim, and, if a provable claim, the
trustee shall value it, and the claim is
thereafter, subject to this section, deemed a
proved claim to the amount of its valuation.
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
53
|
(2) Subsections 135(3) and (4) of the Act
are replaced by the following:
|
|
Notice of
determination
or
disallowance
|
(3) Where the trustee makes a
determination under subsection (1.1) or,
pursuant to subsection (2), disallows, in whole
or in part, any claim, any right to a priority or
any security, the trustee shall forthwith
provide, in the prescribed manner, to the
person whose claim was subject to a
determination under subsection (1.1) or whose
claim, right to a priority or security was
disallowed under subsection (2), a notice in
the prescribed form setting out the reasons for
the determination or disallowance.
|
|
Determination
or
disallowance
final and
conclusive
|
(4) A determination under subsection (1.1)
or a disallowance referred to in subsection (2)
is final and conclusive unless, within a thirty
day period after the service of the notice
referred to in subsection (3) or such further
time as the court may on application made
within that period allow, the person to whom
the notice was provided appeals from the
trustee's decision to the court in accordance
with the General Rules.
|
|
Application
|
(3) Subsection (1) or (2) applies to
bankruptcies or proposals in respect of
which proceedings are commenced after
that subsection comes into force.
|
|
|
90. (1) Subparagraphs 136(1)(b)(i) and
(ii) of the Act are replaced by the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Subsection 136(1) of the Act is
amended by adding the following after
paragraph (d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Paragraph 136(1)(f) of the French
version of the Act is replaced by the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
1992, c. 27, s.
54(2)
|
(4) Paragraph 136(1)(i) of the French
version of the Act is replaced by the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Application
|
(5) Subsection (2) applies to bankruptcies
or proposals in respect of which
proceedings are commenced after that
subsection comes into force.
|
|
|
91. Subsections 149(2) to (4) of the Act are
replaced by the following:
|
|
Court may
extend time
|
(2) Where a person notified under
subsection (1) does not prove the claim within
the time limit or within such further time as the
court, on proof of merits and satisfactory
explanation of the delay in making proof, may
allow, the claim of that person shall,
notwithstanding anything in this Act, be
excluded from all share in any dividend, but a
taxing authority may notify the trustee within
the period referred to in subsection (1) that it
proposes to file a claim as soon as the amount
has been ascertained, and the time for filing
the claim shall thereupon be extended to three
months or such further time as the court may
allow.
|
|
Federal
income tax
claims
|
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2), a claim
may be filed for an amount payable under the
Income Tax Act within the time limit referred
to in subsection (2) or within three months
from the time the return of income or other
evidence of the facts on which the claim is
based is filed or comes to the attention of the
Minister of National Revenue.
|
|
No dividend
allowed
|
(4) Unless the trustee retains sufficient
funds to provide for payment of any claims
that may be filed under the Income Tax Act, no
dividend shall be declared until the expiration
of three months after the trustee has filed all
returns that the trustee is required to file.
|
|
|
92. (1) Section 155 of the Act is amended
by adding the following after paragraph
(d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|